✍️ Market makers are beginning to lure passive funds into the trap The most interesting behavior now is that there are not as many fish in the market, and it can even be said that fish may not be available anymore. And if market makers want to make money, there must be volatility. Previous methods: 1. By offering favorable news and fishing, people can go short and then raise the price to allow the Air Force to produce fuel; 2. By opening a negative rate, even if the market is sideways, it can still defeat the opponent's market; 3. Create a bearish market by yourself, then have others chase after the bullish trend, and then smash the market by yourself; And now the way is: 1. Starting to attack @ HyperliquidX's HLP through JEllYJELY; Until the day before yesterday 2. Start attacking @ Lighter_xyz's LLP through ARC; Let's talk about it last night 3. It seems that there is an intention to start attacking @ Aster_deX through PIPPIN. Are they all trying to passively get the other party's treasury funds on board? There is a situation where a group of people short MSTR before, betting that it will be removed from indices such as MSCI. This will lead to a group of funds tracking the index choosing to sell MSTR. (Similarly, when these funds join, they also buy it.) The core logic is actually whether it can make more people end up In fact, the core logic is to extract all the fish from the fishing ground and work together to increase the number of fish. It's like when JELLYJELLY was directly sanctioned by @ HyperliquidX, and everyone knew it was going to fall. What would you choose to do? It's like ARC being directly targeted by @ Lighter_xyz in various ways for positions and rates, and most people are short selling. What would you do? Then a conditioned reflex was formed directly. Yesterday, a group of people in PIPPIN saw a large long position on @ Aster_deX and began to be targeted. Under the guidance of the equation, a group of people went empty. At the very least, it indicates that the logic that allows people to enter the gambling arena exists. The core logic is to have more fish, otherwise there won't be enough to eat. Market makers become top predators, wherever there is fish, whether it is in a pond or in someone else's home, they try their best to get it into their mouth. So think about the logic behind everything and who will be the biggest winner. For example, the ARC from the day before yesterday, is Big Brother really waiting for death? It can't escape from @ Lighter_xyz, but it can be used elsewhere. So it must be said that those who are willing to spend a lot of money to do something must have some ulterior motives. ✍️ Game between Hunter and Fish This game itself is unfair, so there's nothing to say. The winning rate is also unequal, the status is also unequal, and the chips are also unequal. Just play around when it's purely about checking liquidity. It was originally possible for big fish to eat small fish and small fish to eat shrimp, but instead of transforming into fish to fight against hunters, it's better to directly transform into Kun. Do you think all fish are Kun 。 Fish eat fish, but also go to places with more fish. If it's really not possible, go into hibernation and wait until there are fish before coming out. Now everyone is smart. If you can't find liquidity upwards, then look downwards for liquidity. If you can't find it at all, then let the liquidity in the middle go to waste.