The public chain track has always had an almost unsolvable problem, If the airdrop Farm is passed, the activity of the entire chain will plummet sharply Let's talk about an emerging Layer-1 called @ xone_chain Xone Chain that is solving this type of problem, The naming inspiration for the public chain should be related to Musk's social platform X, Its goal is also simple: through its unique Behavior Value Incentive (BVI) mechanism, Transforming various effective behaviors of users on the blockchain directly into quantifiable value returns involves quantifying interactions and attention as contribution incentives. BVI can be understood as an official built-in, permanently running airdrop system, or a use to earn model. The BVI mechanism will continuously capture, analyze, and quantify various valuable behaviors of users on the chain, such as: -Interacting with DApps -Providing liquidity or lending in DeFi protocols -Participate in community governance voting -Invite new users to join the ecosystem The system will convert these behaviors into indicators similar to contribution points (GV value), and then convert the contribution points into real on chain value according to rules, such as the platform's native token XOC or governance voting rights. Xone @ xone_chain also has an on chain identity system (Xone Identity) to ensure the sustainability of this gameplay, but it is uncertain whether it can be transferred on chain. Of course, the performance of public chains is relatively sufficient to cope with current encryption usage, with a block time of 1 second, 50000 theoretical TPS (A-TP TPS should be around 3000), almost negligible GAS fees, and integrated zk SNARKs that allow users to conduct anonymous transactions. The other side of the problem of on chain activity lies in capital and wool parties In fact, the combination of BVI and DID has to some extent alleviated the high-frequency and low value operations of the wool party, generating a large amount of on chain noise and the risk of junk trading, BVI itself can be considered as transitioning from capital driven to user driven. If incentives are appropriate, the retention of users and wool party members will not be too bad (data shows that the current active addresses are around 65K). In other words, the growth flywheel of XONE's community depends on whether the incentive model can accurately link meaningful and ecologically contributing behaviors. Finally, returning to the main core of the success or failure of L1, even if Xone has a sufficiently motivated user base, it is no exception. Of course, I also believe that this is where Xone has an advantage over other L1. This core is whether there can be a Killer App on the chain, similar to Unisat, pump. fun, AAVE. In theory, the initial ecological stage of Xone can concentrate resources and focus on directing users towards one or two iconic applications that can fully leverage the power of the BVI mechanism. At the same time, this application itself can also contribute to the value and BVI of Xone. At least I think this is the first thing that Xone needs to consider at present. To sum up, although it is still in the early stages, I am still optimistic about the exploratory significance of Xone's innovative model. Of course, whether it can enter the mainstream public chain in the next industry upward cycle needs to be tested through practical applications. However, with the differentiation theme of incentive activity, @ xone_chain Xone still has considerable potential.