In recent days, @ brevis_zk has frequently appeared in my field of vision. Not because of hype, but because they are doing something that nobody wants to do, but everyone needs it—— Enable incentives, data, and privacy to be validated rather than promised. 1/ Many projects are shouting 'transparency', but the truth is—— Most incentive allocation, airdrop algorithms, and user behavior evaluation are still black box operations. What you see is the result, not the logic. Siege Lion believes that this is actually Web3's biggest trust deficit: It's not that the chain is opaque, but rather that the rules' on chain 'are opaque. 2/ Brevis is using ZK (zero knowledge proof) to solve this root disease. Their zk Coprocessor has been launched on BNB Chain, Enable smart contracts to directly access historical states, call complex logic, and then use proof of chain verification. What does it mean? In the past, project rewards relied on centralized scripts, but now they can be directly verified on the chain, Fast, traceable, and anti fraud. 3/ Recently, they have also launched the Providing Grounds campaign. This is not the kind of 'check-in style airdrop', but a verification of your participation through behavior. The "Sparks" obtained by each user will be directly linked to your contribution weight. The siege lion believes that this mechanism is somewhat like a "Proof of Action"—— It's not that you shouted loudly, but what you really did. Whether the future TGE stage can obtain core allocation is likely to depend on this wave of accumulation. 4/ What's even more interesting is that Brevis has turned 'historical data access' into an on chain capability. The significance of this matter is greater than many people imagine: Incentives are no longer limited to individual transactions or interactions, but can be evaluated based on long-term behavior. For example, if a user provides real liquidity for six consecutive months or engages in active multi protocol interactions, The project team can provide continuous rewards instead of snapshot style short-term incentives. The siege lion believes that this is the true breakthrough point of the "Farm → Dump → Die" dead loop. 5/ Recent data can also illustrate the issue: Brevis' Coprocessor network has generated millions of proof requests cumulatively, Serving multiple protocols and chains, it has become the "computing layer" at the bottom of the ecosystem. This is not just about 'being able to run', but about 'starting to run out of dosage'. In the ZK race track, this is a critical point. 6/ But the siege lion also reminds us: Brevis' ambition is not just about making tools, it wants to do 'incentivize infrastructure'. The real challenge lies ahead: How to decentralize the verification network? How to establish node reputation? Who is in charge of the challenge mechanism and arbitration rules? All of these determine whether it can become a 'sustainable trust layer'. 7/ As for TGE? Don't look at Sparks like regular points now, Siege Lion Guessing, behind this is actually a community screening mechanism. Sparks accumulated in the early stage of "soft behavior+content influence", It may be amplified by the ZK weight coefficient in the second stage. In other words, who participates seriously first and who contributes content first, Finally, it will be highlighted in the on chain weight model. 8/ The siege lion has always felt that: The value of ZK is not just privacy, but the mathematization of trust. Brevis is using it to redefine the concept of 'black box incentives'—— Enable reward formulas, data logic, and behavior weights to be validated on the chain. At that moment, the so-called 'transparency' finally took on a technical meaning. 9/Conclusion Web3 is not lacking in innovation, but in validation. Brevis is not chasing the trend, it is fixing the underlying 'trust bug' in the system. The siege lion believes that this is the engineering logic that can transcend cycles: A bragging project relies on popularity, while a team building a system relies on mathematics. In the world of @ brevis_zk, you don't have to trust the project team, you just need to trust the proof.