[Crypto Journalist: U.S. Judge Appears More Sympathetic to Uniswap Developers, 'Neutral Infrastructure' May Be a Key Criterion for Judgment] Odaily Planet Daily News – Crypto journalist Eleanor Terrett posted on the X platform, stating that upon reviewing the trial of Tornado Cash co-founder Roman Storm, Judge Failla used a self-driving car analogy in the lawsuit filed by user Nessa Risle against Uniswap. The judge seemed more sympathetic toward the developers behind Uniswap, while being stricter with Tornado Cash's developers. According to related materials shared by Eleanor Terrett, the judge's perspective is that holding software developers accountable for strangers misusing neutral infrastructure defies logic. In this context, Uniswap is considered 'neutral infrastructure,' whereas Tornado Cash is deemed to have 'engaged in illegal financial activities' (continuing operations despite knowing it was being used for money laundering). This statement suggests that U.S. courts may, in future cases involving decentralized finance (DeFi) infrastructure liability, consider whether developers merely provided neutral tools rather than actively participated in illegal activities.