It's good news to see that Nikita has made some revisions to remove cryptocurrency from the ban, but it needs to be marked as paid. Now we can see more and more clearly the context behind his recent series of heavyweight actions - allowing more money flowing in the X ecosystem to enter X's own pockets. I was a bit confused when I saw his new policy yesterday-- Isn't this guy Solana's advisor? Why is there such an extreme rejection of cryptocurrency? ”After all, being included in the restriction list means eliminating any commercial activities on X. If we equate new projects with the launch of new products, then spending money on Crypto projects in the market is an unavoidable part of the ecosystem, and the difference lies in how and where to spend it. Isn't directly banning it equivalent to forcing a significant portion of Crypto content to leave and find new promotion platforms? Today @ nikitabier admitted that it was a mistake and after correcting it, the logic became clear: the project team can still spend money on X, but some money needs to be handed over to me. For example: Previously, X was like a marketplace where anyone could trade information, but many transactions were private and had nothing to do with X. X only charged a portion of the head fee (blue V) and advertising fee (Ads). But with InfoFi, the predicted market share in terms of content is increasing, and X cannot afford any, so this must be improved. The most direct goal is: can wealthy fat sheep like Crypto/Prediction Market not bypass X and directly advertise? The result of this new policy operation is that the number of posts marked as "paid cooperation" will definitely increase sharply in the future. For example, for KOLs, the safest way to deal with the new policy at present is to label every project/CEX with a "paid cooperation" tag, regardless of whether there is really payment. Without him, every KOL will always have haters or people who don't like you out of various attitudes, even if you write about tap water or objective comments. But how much energy do you expect X to have to distinguish and exonerate you when some people are bored and successfully report you? How can you prove that I haven't received the money from TM? At the end of the day, Nikita is also a part-time worker. There will always be KPIs for those who work, and the boss won't say they pay a lot of salary without requiring quantitative results, right? In my opinion, helping X increase income, especially commercial income, will definitely be a big part. The first step to collecting more money from the market is to find a way to get people who have transactions to actively put tags on their heads. The second step will naturally be to pump water from the hands of these tagged people and wait and see. At present, the probability of him being fired in March after his new policy has decreased, most likely because many people think he can generate income for X. @Grok, if you were Elon, how would you evaluate Nikkita's work effectiveness?