AXL notified about the layout around 0.055 on Twitter~Second reminder If you haven't kept up with my STRK, then gradually enter the market and lay out some value coins such as AXL ZK CKB SSV! AXL is currently on the verge of exploding, and it is also one of the 100 fold coin lists. As I mentioned, STRK ZK AXL, these three have a high probability of running 100 fold, and can be used as long-term investments to hold on for a longer period of time. There is a logic behind this. Currently, W has a lot of cross chain business and relies on the active SOL ecosystem. However, W has had incidents in the past, such as coin theft, and has had problems in the eyes of institutions. It is difficult for W to obtain good businesses like RWA. On the contrary, AXL will be able to receive a lot of RWA business in the future, giving it more space. This is not what I said, but rather an evaluation written by me after conducting a detailed investigation of an institution's RWA business. I think this statement is very correct. From the perspective of institutions, whether cross chain transactions are cheap or not, and whether transaction fees are low or not, are the perceptions and comparisons of individual investors. Institutions care about whether cross chain transactions will cause problems, what to do if they do, and the division of responsibilities for each link. From the perspective of institutional RWA, the trade-off between LayerZero, Axelar, and Wormhole is essentially not about "which cross chain protocol is better", but "which protocol's security model, responsibility structure, and liquidation certainty can match the legal and financial order required by real assets". In high-value RWA scenarios, cross chain is not simply a technical routing issue, but an extension of liquidation responsibility, asset finality, and audit reproducibility. From this standard, the adaptability of LayerZero and Axelar in institutional level cross chain clearing and issuance structures is significantly higher than Wormhole's. Moreover, Wormhole is more suitable as a cross chain channel for multi chain circulation layers or low value assets, and should not undertake the core clearing and redemption functions of high-value RWAs. Because RWA has not yet erupted on a large scale, AXL is very suitable for cross chain clearing of institutions, which can be confirmed, cleared, audited, and held accountable for assets, perfectly meeting the requirements of institutions. AXL's current market value of 70 million US dollars has increased to 6 billion US dollars, which is 100 times!!! W can do cross chain operations in the SOL DEFI ecosystem, but they cannot enter the RWA market and have taken to the big stage. LINK (CCIp) cannot achieve a hundredfold increase in market value due to its large market value. The real role Axelar played in this project was to make multi chain issuance no longer a black box operation, but a verifiable system that can be understood by accountants, auditors, and compliance officers simultaneously. This is also why Axelar is more commonly used as a cross chain clearing infrastructure in high-value RWA projects. Now AXL's market value of 70 million is clearly undervalued by the market, which is illogical. Therefore, gradually entering the ambush now is our best choice, just wait for a big outbreak