After reading this, my feeling is: I don’t care what you think, I care what I think. Even after reading the whole thing, I still don’t understand why the freeze happened—there’s a lack of details and relevant evidence. For example: The deposit of these 50 BTC and subsequent series of operations formed the key conditions exploited in the attack path of this security incident. What exactly were the deposit and subsequent operations? Be specific, show some relevant screenshots as proof, otherwise it’s just confusing. Another example: This is where the problem occurred. The risk control team told me that during their follow-up communication with the user claiming to be the victim, the person used multiple different names and online identities, and stated that all these identities belonged to them. At the same time, their explanations regarding the usage of the relevant accounts and several key facts were inconsistent. What are the account usage details and key facts? Can you explain more clearly? I think the community, aside from some people who don’t know the truth accusing you of embezzlement, also includes many people who simply can’t understand the truth from your so-called PR announcements. Ugh, this is so frustrating. Did anyone actually understand this? Please come out and explain it～