In the era of AI-driven hacking, to borrow a line from Fan Wei's comedy sketch: It's just impossible to guard against. Security is always an asymmetrical game of offense and defense. Defense requires perfection, while an attack only needs to exploit a single vulnerability. But I believe Bitget will definitely pull through. After all, even the CEO is using GPT to tweet, so I trust the team can leverage AI to strengthen defenses, investigate, and even recover stolen funds in the shortest time possible. Why do I say it’s GPT-generated? Because of this patch-like negation at the end: ‘Not making premature promises on timelines that can’t be fulfilled.’ I’m sure many of you have seen GPT pull this kind of move before. I’ve even had the thought of outright banning GPT from using these negation patches at the end of sentences. Honestly, I’m just tired of hearing them.