Recently, I saw in DC that Axis @ axisrobotics has launched a 'Challenger Program', which is more worthy of attention for task masters. Simply put, Axis screens out the contributors who perform well and opens up a task pool with higher difficulty and scores. The current official mechanism is: ·Challenger mission points are approximately 2-3 times higher than standard missions ·The task difficulty is higher, and the requirement for contribution quality is also higher ·You can view the 'Seek the Unseen' badge in your personal profile ·If this badge is already lit up, it indicates that you have entered the challenger qualification range and can go to see the corresponding task I think this design is quite interesting. Because at the Axis stage, simply doing more tasks may no longer be the only criterion, and the importance of contribution quality, task completion status, and continuous participation records will become increasingly high. I also suggest everyone to remember the timing: Every Monday at 12:00: Update the whitelist Every Monday at 4:00 PM: Release new Challenger missions So if you have already obtained the qualification, you can focus on checking if there are any new tasks every Monday afternoon. If you have already entered Challenger, carefully choose tasks that you are good at and try to do them with good quality, which may be more important than simply pursuing quantity. Of course, as a clumsy person like me, I am quite envious when I see 2-3 times the points After all, for a normal task, you can earn twice as much, while for a challenger, if they can earn 2-3 times in the same amount of time, the long-term difference is still very significant. Friends who haven't received the whitelist yet don't need to rush. I think the more practical way now is to continue doing tasks → improve pass rates → try different types of data contributions → accumulate your own contribution records. Don't go crazy about brushing low-quality content just for the sake of points, it's easy to ruin your own records. The recent mechanism of Axis gives me the feeling that it is gradually establishing a hierarchical system of data contributors. For early participants, what is truly valuable may be running a record of their contributions. My personal suggestion for working on Axis: If you have a Challenger, take it seriously; Temporarily ineligible, continue with regular tasks; Don't just focus on points, pay more attention to your pass rate and contribution quality. After all, what early projects really need is often not a group of wool sheep just for airdrops, but a group of people who can continuously provide effective data. And the earlier such contribution records begin to accumulate, the more valuable they may be later on. Of course, the final points, eligibility, and future rewards will still depend on Axis's official follow-up rules. What can be confirmed now is that the Challenger program has started to significantly increase the weight of 'high-quality contributions'. I will continue with the tasks and official actions behind me, especially whether the Challenger whitelist will be further expanded in the future, and how the points system will ultimately be combined with future incentives. I think these two points are more worth watching.