The military action of the United States is still relatively limited, but it is prone to misjudgment According to a report by Golden Finance, Abas Aslani, a senior researcher at the Middle East Strategic Studies Center based in Tehran, stated that the fatal strike launched by the United States was a countermeasure to Iran's insistence on the "new security arrangement" in the Strait of Hormuz. He stated that Trump initially viewed this temporary agreement as an "exit mechanism" to avoid a larger war with Iran. Aslani said, "He is facing pressure from domestic public opinion, as well as pressure from the Israeli side, which may be why he is taking such actions to save face." As the situation becomes increasingly complex, the window for resolving the issue through diplomatic means is narrowing. He pointed out that Iran sees these strikes as an attempt to weaken its control over the Strait of Hormuz, but despite facing military pressure, Tehran still maintains its position. Aslani added, "Recently, these aggressive actions have been relatively limited in timing, scope, and scale... Perhaps the United States is not willing to ignite the powder keg of regional conflicts." However, the situation remains extremely unstable. This is like playing with fire, any misjudgment could lead to the situation getting out of control and evolving into a regional war. Although we have not yet reached that point, this situation is highly likely to happen. "(Jin Shi)