Taiko stated that no user will be harmed due to the theft of $1.7 million from the protocol, implying that full compensation will be required. Do you still remember the classic statement made by the founder of @ taikoxyz's airdrop, which was banned by the entire network due to opaque rules, in the face of public opinion controversy The reason why rules are opaque is that transparency cannot resolve differences. Everyone has a strong subjectivity in defining 'fairness', and we cannot unify or attempt to reach consensus Given this, I speculate that the most optimistic version of Taiko's compensation would be: The lack of transparency in compensation is because transparency cannot resolve differences. Everyone has a strong subjectivity in defining 'damaged', and we cannot unify or attempt to reach consensus Of course, the greater possibility is cold treatment until forgotten.