Peter Thiel Mystery Society Dark Rating Exposed: Big Shot Divided into Three, Six, and Nine Grades, with the highest C-level and the lowest A-level, Discounted Price Based on Fame According to Beating monitoring, WIRED's analysis of the latest leaked data reveals that the mysterious society Dialogue, co founded by Peter Thiel, has an extremely cold and biased "grading and elimination" mechanism within its organization. Dialog implements a secret rule of "rating upon entry". Although the club has thousands of members, only 192 personal files (including 130 regular members and some candidates) that were internally archived by the club were leaked and reviewed by WIRED. They demonstrate the club's counterintuitive hierarchy of disdain: C-level is the highest VIP, B-level is the majority of the ordinary level, and usually considered the best A-level is actually the lowest profile bottom edge layer. This rating system is directly linked to members' wallets. Only about 25% of VIP "C" level executives are required to pay the full attendance fee, while among the bottom "A" level members, the proportion of those who pay tens of thousands of dollars in full attendance fee is as high as 70%. Interestingly, the AI filtering mechanism introduced by Dialog is extremely superstitious about the so-called 'national popularity'. For example, "Thanos" actor Josh Brolin, who never attended the conference, won the VIP "C" level directly with his movie box office and millions of fans; However, academic giant Tyler Cowen was judged by AI to be "not well-known enough among ordinary people" and almost fell into the ordinary level, ultimately relying on manual intervention to barely advance to level C. And the 'value-added score' is the sickle to eliminate 'useless people', specifically measuring members' resource docking and intellectual contributions to other giants in the club. After each gathering, employees will review members' performance like "reviewing code", and those with low value-added scores, cultural incompatibility, or declining voice will be ruthlessly removed from the invitation list. In addition, the leaked database also revealed its built-in social and dating pairing system (10% of members join the singles pool), which includes a "prohibited pairing list" while recommending matches. This supposedly objective evaluation system is also filled with bias: women make up one-third of the members but only receive 18% of VIP seats; In terms of political stance, it is even more difficult to avoid differential treatment. Although more than half of the members claim to be "left leaning", the probability of "right-wing" getting VIP is more than twice that of left leaning individuals. Even some environmental experts' "left leaning" labels have been forcibly rewritten as "right-wing" by employees in the background. [Original link]