The Humanity Protocol survey report reveals the overall temperament of the project, which I can describe in four words: Grass Terrace Team! This whole thing is off the charts! One reason is that after being hacked, the malicious issuance issue remained unresolved for 12 hours, and it seemed like it had been completely resolved. Secondly, the source was actually a colleague's computer that was hacked. In addition to the hot wallet, there were multiple owner keys, totaling seven private key backups stored on the same computer. This is no longer a problem of poor security awareness among some employees, it is the internal permission management of the entire agreement, which is very outrageous! It's outrageous to put the private key backup during the online period of the main network on the computer, It's so outrageous that even one year after going online, the old permissions can still become a single point of explosion for the entire project. What is the original purpose of secure multiple signatures? It is to enable attackers to simultaneously breach different people, devices, and environments. The most ironic thing is that the Humanity Protocol itself is still a set of authentication, privacy proof, anti witch, and Proof of Humanity operations. What is the difference between this series of operations and naked running?