The departure of several core executives from the Ethereum Foundation has once again sparked heated discussions within the industry According to a report by Golden Finance, on May 21st, a large number of personnel from the Ethereum Foundation resigned, once again sparking discussions in the cryptocurrency industry: as the core management organization of Ethereum, what exactly happened internally? Why does the community know so little about its behind the scenes dynamics? After several core celebrities announced their resignations during internal personnel adjustments, community users on the Twitter platform openly questioned the foundation's development direction, management structure, and information communication methods. Cryptocurrency commentator and co-founder of Rollup podcast, Andy, bluntly stated in a post: "What exactly is the problem with the Ethereum Foundation Many industry insiders have also expressed dissatisfaction, believing that the foundation has not clearly explained the reasons for this personnel change, nor has it disclosed the adjustment of internal power and responsibility division. Joon Ian Wong, a well-known figure in the field of cryptocurrency community activities, bluntly stated, "Why can't the Ethereum Foundation achieve transparency in its transactions This public criticism also highlights the long-standing conflicting attitudes of the outside world towards the Ethereum Foundation. This non-profit organization headquartered in Switzerland is mainly responsible for funding technology research, coordinating network upgrades, and leading the ecological development of the world's second largest public chain by market value. Unlike traditional enterprises, the Ethereum Foundation has long adopted a loose decentralized operating model. Some viewpoints suggest that this model can maintain the neutrality of Ethereum and avoid excessive concentration of power; However, some argue that the Ethereum ecosystem now carries hundreds of billions of dollars in assets and massive decentralized financial services, and this operating model has long fallen short of market expectations. And this large-scale personnel turnover has once again pushed this controversy to the forefront.