The review of the CLARITY Act lasted for about 2 hours, and all 12 Democratic amendments were rejected, leading to intense procedural disputes Foresight News reported in real-time that the US Senate Banking Committee has been deliberating on the CLARITY Act for about 2 hours and has completed over 16 votes on amendments. In terms of approval, the committee passed the Chairman's draft orally, the AI Financial Sandbox amendment proposed by Rounds with a score of 15-9, and the Portfolio Margin amendment proposed by McCormick with a score of 18-6; The latest amendment is Lummis Amendment 122, which was passed 18-6 to clarify the criteria for determining the "nominal decentralization" of DeFi protocols. Democratic lawmakers such as Warner and Alssobrooks voted in favor of it. \In terms of rejection, Warren's five amendments, Reed's two, Van Hollen's two, and Cortez Masto, Smith, and Kim each proposed 12 Democratic amendments, all of which were rejected along party lines 11-13. Four amendments, namely Britt, Warner, Warnock, and Gallego, were withdrawn before the vote. \During the deliberation period, there were also procedural disputes. Scott, citing bipartisan negotiations, re released the Lummis series of amendments that were previously rejected on the grounds of "drafting errors," which was strongly opposed by Warren and Van Hollen. Warren demanded equal release of Cortez Masto 16 and the community bank deposit protection amendment supported by law enforcement agencies, but Scott refused, citing the need to advance bipartisan consensus. \In terms of the final vote on the bill, Warren and Warnock have clearly stated their intention to vote against it; Gallego stated that he would vote in favor during the committee stage, but warned that if ethical issues are not resolved, the Senate may vote against it during a full vote; Warner voted in favor of Lummis 122, with a clear inclination towards support. The final bill vote is expected to take place within a few hours.