庞教主
庞教主|5月 06, 2026 11:05
I gradually understood why everyone started to be enthusiastic about Ai transfer stations. At first, I thought it was a low threshold barrier business or a way to ride on the popularity of Ai, but in fact, this may be the biggest trend of AI+encrypted payments Let's talk about a historical event of the Internet. As we all know, when Baidu acquired it, there were other voices. Anyone can do a simple website information aggregation. The reason for Baidu's acquisition is just "simple enough", which is too simple to copy The same is true of the Ai transit station, which itself has no technical barriers. Sun is doing it. WorldClaw supported by WLFI is coming again. Similar to the "unified fragmentation" logic of the Internet information portal in the past, AI is now "highly fragmented". Claude is an account, GPT is an account, Gemini is an account, and it is also a separate API recharge, as well as various restrictions It's too fragmented. Ai Transfer Station aggregates them together and unifies them into one entrance Actually, the Ai transfer station is just such a simple model The same is true of WorldClaw supported by WLFI. If WorldClaw is just a separate Ai transit station, it doesn't mean much, but WLFI has USD 1. The biggest difference between Ai and the traditional Internet is that Ai has to continuously consume services, that is, continuously burn money, which is naturally suitable for "payment" Micro payments, high-frequency transactions, transactions between agents, unified and unrestricted payment standards You will find that only cryptocurrencies are suitable, while traditional payment systems such as Visa and PayPal serve people and have various restrictions, belonging to closed financial payments WLFI's USD1 connection to WorldClaw is indeed highly compatible, without the jarring feeling of hard rubbing, but instead brings imagination, bringing imagination to USD1 The path is gradually emerging. WorldClaw, as an AI transit station, does not have technical barriers, but it is a necessity. First, it provides an entrance to solve the problem of AI fragmentation, and then engages in a price war. It is 30% cheaper, which can be understood as a subsidy for everyone to use it. It is not necessary to use it anywhere Then came the terrifying point, WorldClaw+USD1 payment, a model aggregation entrance, a stablecoin, which would form a very terrifying closed loop Consuming tokens, paying USD1 for on chain settlement, obtaining results, and then calling other agents, an AI economic system that pays in USD1 has started running I think WorldClaw is the most correct step taken by USD1. Essentially, it integrates traditional AI with an open stablecoin system, embeds encrypted finance into existing AI, and creates an AI economy. This is exactly what traditional financial systems cannot achieve because they cannot serve non-human users What the AI economy lacks is an "unrestricted and open" payment system, which currently only cryptocurrency can adapt to. Therefore, WorldClaw is likely to give rise to an unexpected "AI on chain economy"
+4
Mentioned
Share To

Timeline

HotFlash

APP

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Hot Reads