Yearn core developer @banteg stated that LayerZero's description of the KelpDAO incident as 'protocol functioning as expected, stemming from RPC node compromise and RPC poisoning' is inaccurate, arguing that this explanation confuses the concept. They pointed out that it’s more likely the project’s own infrastructure was compromised, rather than a typical case of RPC poisoning. Additionally, the cross-chain bridge should not be hastily restored before the source of the vulnerability is clearly identified.