Monad Joint Creation: If a rate limit is set on collateral supply, today's rsETH event can avoid approximately $200 million in losses According to BlockBeats, on April 19th, Monad's Keone Hon stated in a post that they feel the 'fund pool lending agreement' should set a rate limit on the supply of assets deposited as collateral. For example, if the current supply is 100 million and the supply limit is 300 million, then in the next 10 minutes, the maximum allowed growth is only 110 million, rather than depositing all 200 million at once. Actually, no one needs to complete such a large-scale deposit at once. This is important because when certain 'heterogeneous assets' are attacked, their impact depends on the' exit channel size 'of that asset. Especially in cases where many attacks fall under the category of 'infinite issuance vulnerabilities', the size of exits that can be made largely determines the upper limit of attack losses. Loan agreements are often the biggest exit channel. If a 'smart upper limit' is introduced, where the initial upper limit is slightly higher than the current supply and gradually adjusted to the true upper limit within a few hours, it will have a huge effect. If this mechanism were in place, rsETH depositors could have avoided a loss of approximately $200 million today. This also leads to a viewpoint that asset issuers themselves should support this mechanism. If you are issuing voucher tokens with redemption delays, you are not worried about hackers redeeming them directly from you, but you need to minimize the size of the external exit path as much as possible without affecting normal user usage. Therefore, a high supply ceiling should be seen as a risk rather than a symbol of strength. For example, the Hyperbridge DOT attack did not cause a loss of $100 million because there were very few exit paths available; The reason why the Resolv attack resulted in a loss of $24 million instead of $200 million is because the exit path size limits the upper limit of the loss. This is an obvious truth, but there are still immediate measures that can be implemented: auditing the supply ceiling of all assets and lowering the ceiling unnecessarily