Blockchain technology is the projection of Satoshi Nakamoto's Bitcoin technology in the direction of deterministic Turing machine computability. However, the core of Bitcoin consensus isn't about the computability defined by Turing machines, but rather the computability of uncertain peer-to-peer networks. So, deterministic blockchain technology is essentially soulless Bitcoin technology. As for Starknet's zero-knowledge proof technology, it's just a privacy tool and doesn't have an inherent binding relationship with blockchain technology. And @EliBenSasson abandoning his own zero-knowledge stronghold to constantly ride the coattails of blockchain technology, like layer 2 and so on, is the fundamental reason why this project isn't working. The best approach is: using Satoshi Nakamoto's system architecture combined with zero-knowledge techniques to create better products. Of course, reaching Satoshi Nakamoto's system architecture level in a short time isn't realistic. But refocusing attention on product innovation around zero-knowledge proofs offers much more imagination than sticking to blockchain technology within the deterministic Turing machine computability framework.