Can you guys chill with the clickbait and plagiarism? When hyping up this '93% win rate Kronos,' did you even bother to fact-check? First of all, the '93% win rate' claim is completely false advertising. The paper clearly states: the RankIC metric for price sequence prediction improved by 93% compared to leading time-series baseline models and by 87% compared to non-pretrained baselines. RankIC is an academic ranking correlation metric—it’s not actual trading win rate or prediction accuracy. Also, this is just a research-based foundational model, not some plug-and-play trading miracle. Both the repository README and the paper explicitly disclaim: the model output isn’t 'pure alpha,' and the demo strategy is for reference only. Real trading requires consideration of slippage, fees, risk management, position sizing, etc. And let’s be real—if there were a model with a stable 93% win rate, why would the author open-source it for you to get rich? Unrealistic.