I prefer to view RealGo Season 2 as a 'public experiment of the points economy system' rather than a simple reward increase. Known facts (official information) -Season 2 is about to launch the Points System, and the new interaction rules will take care of both OG and newcomers -Reset all loyalty points: everyone starts from the same starting line -Rewards are strictly based on loyalty; Laziness and cheating=0 points -The reward mechanism of Genesis Mini Harvester is being optimized by the dev team -Upcoming deployment: Initial syrup pool of $5000 meme token+over 5000000 points -All Genesis Mini Harvester holders will receive an additional meme token reward, distributed according to harvesting contribution -The team asked the community to submit their 'favorite meme' in the comment section, and they will review it This design truly aims to solve three systemic challenges: 1) Fairness: Resetting points is to combat 'path dependence' Once many point systems are launched, old players will solidify the rankings through early advantages, and the cost of new players entering will become increasingly high. In the end, the system will only be left with a group of people enjoying themselves. The reset signal is clear: the weight switches from "historical identity" to "current contribution". This will increase the willingness of new users to enter and also force OG to maintain its position through continuous contributions. Research point: After resetting, the advantage of OG should come from "efficiency and understanding" rather than "historical integral stock". This determines whether the system can expand in the long term. 2) Verifiability: Harvesting contribution is a key variable in 'anti wool harvesting' They link Harvester's additional rewards to contributions, essentially emphasizing that rewards are not distributed based on ownership, but on output/participation. This will push users from hoarding to doing. Research point: The definition of contribution must be clear enough, otherwise it will cause two types of problems: -Lack of transparency → questioning fair distribution -Can be maximized by the script → Normal players are squeezed out 3) Anti cheating: Write "cheating=0" in the announcement to indicate that they know the system will be attacked The ultimate outcome of all points games depends on whether you can regain the "rule advantage" from the script/studio. If anti cheating is just a slogan, the more points and rewards there are, the faster the system will be drained. Research point: Anti cheating usually does not rely on a single sentence, but on: -Multidimensional behavioral signals (frequency, path, timing, device/account associations) -Cost curve design (increasing the marginal cost of cheating) -Certainty of punishment (rather than severity of punishment) What does $5000 syrup pool+5000000 points mean? -Points are responsible for driving behavior frequency (short-term) -Meme token is responsible for providing immediate and perceptible returns (mid-term) -And long-term retention depends on the cycle within the product: capture/collect/socialize/battle/advance/asset management (the white paper clearly states to do earn/spend within an app and gradually integrate deeper on chain tools) 4 indicators that I will continue to track (research perspective) 1) New and old distribution after reset: whether the ranking has been "reshuffled", and whether there is a real upward channel for newcomers 2) Is the contribution function interpretable: Can users clearly know what they will contribute more to 3) The effect of anti cheating: Does the studio compress the output to the point where ordinary players cannot compete 4) Closed loop advancement speed: Whether the availability of rewards (how to use/process them after earning) is smooth Last small detail: Ask the community to submit a meme and review it This is actually an attempt to outsource content supply to the community - if meme IPs/tasks/activities can be made into a sustainable UGC pipeline in the future, users will not come to receive rewards, but will participate in a continuously updated content pool. question If you were a system designer, which one would you prioritize sacrificing for long-term health? A Reward Intensity B List Competitiveness C Newcomer Friendly D Cost of Anti Cheating @RealGoOfficial