Since Q has arrived, let me also reply: Binance's public relations strategy has always been one truth and nine falsehoods. So many questions are not answered directly, yet we choose to output from our own comfort zone, hoping to turn all the previous stains into positive ones with just one point. Why is this your comfort zone? Because I am used to being both a referee and an athlete, I define my own narrative, make my own judgments on right and wrong, and announce the winner when something happens. Always like this. But not this time: 1、 Attributing 1011 to Binance and manipulating user emotions is not a viewpoint, but an indisputable fact in the entire industry. The data on the chain is there, the transaction records are there, and the real losses of all network users are there. It's not something that anyone can bring out with rhythm, nor can it be washed away by a small essay. Users have the right to be angry and have the right to question because you have lost real money and silver. Do you call all these sounds' navy '? If Sister Mu is also a water soldier, wouldn't this water be too big? The real feeling of millions of users is like a 'mass production account' in your mouth. This is not responding to me, it is insulting every victimized user. I really want to apologize, Binance owes all users in the cryptocurrency industry a 1011 apology, instead of creating a victim script for "friend merchant attacks". 2、 Define MEME on the BNB chain as issued by Binance Classic is used to being both a referee and an athlete. The essence of MEME is the attention economy, utilizing industry influence to repeatedly mention it on public platforms, raising user expectations, and indirectly guiding users to enter. Blaming outsiders for 'defining market manipulation'? Ecological problems are the responsibility of the platform, not a reason to blame others. May I ask if this is what the second largest shareholder of a so-called 'compliant' exchange can do? As platforms, do you have any sense of responsibility? 3、 Labeling CZ as a scammer and damaging their reputation What we have said and done is all recorded in public records, and every one can be traced and verified. No need to label anyone, facts speak for themselves. But in your article, you have compiled a conspiracy theory of "six wins in one fell swoop" for us throughout. Isn't what you say about 'assertion, repetition, and contagion' what you are doing? 4、 Repeatedly emphasizing compliance, implying that Binance is not compliant Compliance is something that is implemented every day, not a weapon used for verbal arguments. KYC、AML、 Compliance, every one of our items can withstand scrutiny. You asked us, 'Which rules do we follow?'. Maybe you haven't figured out 'compliance' yet. How did you get your own $4.3 billion fine? Who signed the plea agreement? Don't you find these two words ironic when they come out of your mouth? Regarding controlling the media to create a 'richest man' title for you, provide evidence; Are you paying attention to your private life just telling everyone to identify 'who is lying'. Users are not foolish, the market is not blind. The person who should apologize is you.