It's better to catch a typical person and shoot them, or else it's better not to say anything. Since the last big character poster was posted, MM's trading of coins has not changed at all, and she continues to play music and dance. Which coins need to be reported for active market making? It's obvious to everyone, but as for the evidence of trading, CEX may be easier to find from the data than individual investors. Did yesterday's Alpha $R2 meet the definition in the guidelines? This line looks like there are no market makers, they just blatantly smash the market and leave, but is there any punishment? The guide advises the project team to screen the MM well. The intention may be good, but in fact, many malicious project teams are already with MM. Which side is innocent in R2's toe chopping case? Alpha is already one of the few places where new projects can still have retail investor windows. The original intention was to give money to the community, but if there are more "benefits" like this that don't even require face recognition, it may be better to reduce the frequency of Alpha and adjust it to a better level, so as not to give garbage project parties a chance to cut leeks. In times of chaos, heavy discipline is used, words must be followed up on, and actions must yield results. If Binance has already punished market makers for violating regulations, I suggest regularly disclosing how many have been done, how much capital has been raised, and which shameless projects have been done, in order to be effective. Saying it but not being able to do it actually weakens authority, Period