Logic is not so convoluted. Users participate in pre-sales based on their trust in @ KaitoAI. Is the platform just a payment channel without any review responsibility? In the situation where the project party has not fulfilled TGE's commitment for a long time, Kaito actually 'transferred all the funds' to the project party without any risk control. This is not only throwing the blame, but also extremely irresponsible to pre-sale users. The platform has harvested traffic, but now when something goes wrong, all that remains is' the money has been taken '? Our demand: Please urge @ billions_ntwk to make an official Twitter announcement and apologize to the community for not fulfilling their promised TGE time as soon as possible! According to this logic, as long as the platform is responsible for transferring the money, everything will be fine? So from now on, the project team can draw a pie and Kaito will be responsible for collecting and transferring money. If they can't send out the coins, everyone can collectively look at the Coinbase roadmap to 'satisfy their hunger'? As a platform party, basic accountability mechanisms and funding loops cannot be achieved. What is the difference between this and helping the project party 'soft escape'? Our demand: Please urge @ billions_ntwk to make an official Twitter announcement and apologize to the community for not fulfilling their promised TGE time as soon as possible!