Last night's bombing of Iran's natural gas fields and oil facilities was carried out independently by Israel or in collaboration with the United States and Israel? What does Trump's reaction show? The latest report of the Wall Street Journal shows that this is not Israel's "single action", but an action that has been tacitly approved, approved or coordinated by the United States. Trump knows and supports this action in advance. Without the support of US refueling planes, Israeli fighter jets would not have been able to fly over the South Pars gas field. Only after the attack, Trump hoped that he would not launch more attacks on Iran's energy facilities. What does it mean? This shows that although Xiachuanpu has started the mode of violence, he actually hopes to "promote talks by fighting". Trump regards the bombing of military facilities on Hark Island in the early morning of last Saturday, the bombing of launch positions on the coast of the Iranian Strait of Hormuz the night before last, and the bombing of the South Pars Gas Field last night as a stronger signal for Iran to blockade the Strait of Hormuz. Now he does not want to go any further. It depends on Iran's reaction and actions. Of course, Trump is also open to attacking more Iranian energy facilities. However, Iran is still quite tough now. Last night, Iran attacked the Ras Laffan Industrial City in Qatar, which is the world's largest liquefied natural gas (LNG) export hub. Qatar Energy Company and the Ministry of Defense have confirmed that at least one missile has landed, causing a fire, production interruption, and partial export suspension. The facility handles about 20% of the global LNG supply, and the attack has pushed up global natural gas prices. At the same time, Iran also attacked energy targets in eastern provinces such as Saudi Arabia's Jubail petrochemical complex and Samlev refinery What could this easily become? Is it here the day before yesterday, https://(x.com)/qinbufark/status/2033805350055645505? The 'oiling mode' discussed at s=20: I will increase the dosage and intensity to see your reaction, and if the effect is not good, I will continue to increase the dosage. So in the morning, I saw that the US Department of Defense was seeking to allocate 200 billion US dollars for the war against Iraq, and then Reuters reported that the Trump government was considering deploying thousands of US soldiers (not only an amphibious combat readiness group that will arrive in the Middle East next week and its attached Marine Expeditionary Force), adding weight layer by layer. This is certainly what Israel wants to see. American media Axios reported that the military and intelligence agencies of the United States and Israel are working together, but each target has its own focus. The United States is almost exclusively focused on military objectives; Israel simultaneously carried out high-level assassinations and took other actions aimed at paving the way for regime change. Senior US officials said that for Trump, regime change was just icing on the cake. He plans to end the war after achieving core military objectives, including destroying Iran's missile program, nuclear program, navy, and providing financial support for proxy armed forces. But at the same time, it also bluntly stated, "Israel will try to get rid of Iran's new leaders. Their interest in this is far greater than ours On the whole, Trump started the mode of violence, put more pressure on Iran's hard liners with the purpose of "promoting talks through fighting". However, Iran's tough counterattack and Israel's more aggressive measures may lead the situation towards a "refueling mode", causing the United States to continuously intensify and slide towards a "final battle" mode. Currently, I consider "using physical violence to promote conversation" as the benchmark scenario Treat the 'final battle' as a potential risk. This article is sponsored by @ bitget_zh, titled 'Bitget Buying US Stocks: Instant Entry, Smooth Trading'