Isn't this example a real-life proof of the debate last year at the end of BBW between @cz_binance about gold and Bitcoin BTC? When faced with the threat of war, gold is physical, relying on logistics and shipping. War blockades can lead to local overstock and discounts. But when the Middle East situation escalated, the withdrawal volume of crypto exchanges in Iran surged by 700%. This shows that under expectations of fiat currency devaluation and banking sanctions, locals are more inclined to convert their wealth into BTC to escape or hedge at any time. Doesn't this highlight one of BTC's greatest advantages? It solves the problem of "how to carry a lifetime of savings through a war zone," and this advantage is irreplaceable. Of course, BTC now behaves more like a risk asset. This consensus still needs more examples of wars and turmoil to be forged. Don't forget, it took gold thousands of years to reach today's consensus. I'm patient.