Predict hair grooming strategy, I have written too much analysis and am too lazy to write it Fundamental analysis of the project: https://(x.com)/maid_crypto/status/2017500816886694075? s=20 Test guide 2+hair grooming script https://((x.com))/maid_crypto/status/2025387939610722757? s=20 share Why did I only participate in @ creditdotfun besides polymarket when predicting the market Bsc Three Idiots Opinion focuses on relationships, benchmarking against Aster Relationship currency is the most disgusting narrative of BSC, which has been heavily suppressed by the first sister. Probable is backed by Pancake and focuses on zero transaction fees, benchmarking against Lighter Zero transaction fees make your points worthless in my eyes Predict Main focus on automatic interest generation of idle funds, benchmarking against Standx No matter what those KOLs say, I'm just talking about products. Bsc's classic per is stand x Dow Jones predicts the market by saying 'predict'. The rest are rebels, they are here to beat up BSC, not to support BSC. I don't know how Standx and Predict, who are relatively bottom, will ultimately win, but I firmly believe that what is black in this world is black, and what is white is white. If doing the right thing can lead to good results, these two projects can win. At the same time, predict is also the least friendly among the three idiots in BSC towards grooming Almost no weight is given to the final round. Points are only given to real users (pending orders+popular event pending orders) Some people say that merging projects is not cost-effective for Probale's points. I don't think it's like that at all Probale points with zero transaction fees are not worth much in the first place, while predicted points are all mined out of real money by hanging orders Is there anything bad about Predict? Yes, the level of product operation is not high The opening taste is not high. The opening lacks appeal. I haven't received any predictions from Musk's tweets about the opening of the market pearl The trading volume is the lowest among the three idiots, and the UI taste is not high. These are objective existences. I understand that they have spent a lot of time improving and idle assets are earning interest. Wait for these C-end users to see things that are unclear at first glance. For example, let me talk about the opinion oracle's house play oracle, which is centralized. From this, it can be seen that this project does not want to be done in the long term Predict uses a hybrid mechanism of the same core mechanism as PolyMarket, UMAL optimistic oracle, original AI challenge, and manual verification. From this, it can be seen that this project is intended for the long term Additionally, there are some projects that have been under development for so long but have only opened without even making a oracle. How could they not be scammers? What's the difference between this and soldiers going to the battlefield without guns