The tug of war between Aave Labs and the community continues, with BGD Labs leaving (the side that made significant contributions on the development side) and Zeller continuing to be on full fire, publishing an audit report on Labs on the forum, Summarize briefly 1 took a lot of money and accomplished very few things. Where did the 2 dollars go, how were they spent, and the wallet and position are not transparent. 3 is forcefully pushing forward V4. 4 performed poorly in the competition between Morpho and Sky. There are also some disclosures regarding the actual contribution of Labs compared to DAO contribution, and it is important to express the attitude towards the upcoming vote on the [Save Will Win] proposal. The article suggests (1) It is necessary to split the voting into revenue alignment, V4 approval, foundation establishment, and 51 million funds. (2) Before transferring 75k AAVE, disclose the complete wallet holdings of Labs and release a complete transparency report. (3) First establish a foundation, then give money. (4) Set a revenue cap for each product and specify KPI/milestones (such as V4 deposits reaching a specified TVL, etc.). Before reaching the V4 milestone, V3 parameter adjustments will be frozen for 12-18 months. If the above requirements are not met, it is recommended to reject the proposal. Let's see how Aave Labs responds and whether this important vote will be affected in the future. This should be the first true governance power dispute case in Crypto.