I’ve made a lot of bold *very* early claims from my research over the past 2 years that resulted in me taking a lot of shade before they panned out: * CZ money laundering for Wagner * Justin Sun using Chinese shell companies and TUSD to laundry party funds * Trump being bad for crypto and aiming to use it to enable foreign bribery * Epstein 10:39pm sighting is a person and not a color glitch * FTX insolvency and unable to redeem deposits Some of them took days to pan out, others took years. And because they are big swings, and long threads of original evidence, I often take months of people dismissing them as crazy long before I get vindication. So far, all of these have now been confirmed. I suspect the next one we get confirmed is the Trump stroke hypothesis. In the past, I’ve let that negative sentiment get to me. So I’m trying to really focus on celebrating my wins and 5/6 of my biggest contrarian takes from the last 2 years being proven already is a solid track record. …BUT most importantly, the pale in comparison to some of the stories I’ve been working on. And 2026 is going to have some of the wildest claims you’ve seen yet. And I’m very confident those ones will pan out just the same. I’m not a news room. I’m just a guy writing stories others don’t dig into, because it’s too early or too fringe for journalists to run with. And some like to dismiss me as tabloid because of that. And so to those haters, I just have to say, call me when the tabloids start getting DoJ confirmation - and in the mean time, I’m going to keep breaking stories a year before CBS takes them seriously 🫳🎤(Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth))