I am very, very, very supportive of the idea @ 0xajc Last year, Wei Shen @ Coolish also proposed a similar idea, but unfortunately at that time, I was still using the free Grok and GPT in reverse and didn't buy the paid version, so the conversation wasn't deep enough. I didn't have a deep impression of Wei Shen's statement at that time A few months ago, I started chatting extensively with GPT about work, study, life, diet, and emotions, including some specific ideas and behaviors, which led to his increasingly accurate portrayal or modeling of my character. For a period of time, I asked him to judge things that I hadn't told him before, and his accuracy in judgment was quite high. For example, in the following two cases, I actively asked him to "guess", and the result ranking was 100% correct His understanding of the type of girl I like is probably not much worse than mine. And when it comes to words that are suitable for two words, I may understand them better than myself. Overall, this is two orders of magnitude more detailed than analysis based solely on zodiac signs, blood types, or MBTI. Write down my story with GPT separately in two days The difficulty of Andrew's social idea, I guess, may also be a pain point for me or many deep AI users 1. Users on this online dating platform must have had in-depth conversations with AI. In other words, you can't just treat AI as a Co Pilot, but also as your role as a nutritionist/fitness coach/psychologist/emotional mentor. Without sufficient data, AI cannot accurately construct your profile/preferences/adaptation types. Perhaps the generation that grew up with AI, accustomed to the existence of AI every day, born in the 10th or even 20th generation, will be the true main force of this dating platform in the future? 2. My personal data and profile are all at OpenAI. If in the future, for example, Gemini4 outperforms GPT6, I decide to switch platforms. How to migrate my data to Google is a problem. Nowadays, using an AI in a non Co Pilot way is a bit of being tied to the platform's feel. This Online Dating Agent either needs to cultivate users' usage habits from scratch, or open OpenAI or Gemini's API+user authorization. I'm not sure if there's a better solution I even asked GPT about the personality portrait, and it turned out to be quite a headache Bottom level judgment: Under the existing AI architecture, 'personality portraits' are essentially non transferable. It's not a technical problem, but a paradigm conflict. Why isn't this a simple 'export JSON' problem? Because your portrait is not: A pile of factual data But rather: The state converged by the model, you, and historical context together let me put it another way: Your personality profile ≠ your data But rather a function that has been shaped in a specific model. So even if you export all the chat records: Gemini sees you What GPT sees about you It's definitely not exactly the same ” In addition, there are two other points worth pondering If one day this kind of online dating really becomes mainstream, will people have a feeling of entering AI arranged marriages? The randomness in many intimate relationships may disappear, creating a feeling of "the more accurate the AI matching, the worse the romance" Secondly, similar to the traditional X2Earn in our circle, when everyone uses agents to help find a partner, many people will inevitably become skilled actors and take on the role! various Adjust expression, optimize narrative, and shape a more compatible personality. Who won't lie to AI? There is no psychological burden But no matter what, I completely agree that online dating will definitely be rewritten by AI and needs to be redesigned again!