After taking a break, my mind became clearer. Recently, I have seen people discussing the differences between FourMeme and Flap mechanisms. More and more people are embracing @ flapdotsh. In my opinion, the real difference between these two platforms is whether DEV plans to manage this project after issuing coins? Let me first say that FourMeme is not a problem, and it can even be said that it is done very "industry standard". The process is clear, the mechanism is stable, and the coin issuance is smooth, which meets the emotional and fast-paced requirements of Meme. Once you go up, you can P. But to put it bluntly, its characteristic is how to push coins to the market faster ， And you can see that thousands of projects are generated on 4meme in a day. My opinion on Flap is, if DEV doesn't want to just do a wave of work, then how can the project survive? At first, many people may not feel this difference because most of them are still immersed in PVP thinking. However, after the snowball, more and more people are gradually becoming aware of what community building and long termism are? The design logic of Flap is very straightforward. As long as there are still people playing with the project, there is a reason to continue operating. As long as the mechanism is set reasonably, even if DEV runs away, it can continue to survive through the mechanism. This may directly change the project's previous abandonment behavior, or even shift from a mindset of pulling and cutting leeks to a long-term operational mindset. To put it bluntly, in the past, the project team relied on pulling disks and cutting leeks to make money. After the project team poured water on everyone, the project died. Flap's structure allows the project team to add innovative design mechanisms within the originally set mechanism of the Butterfly platform. DEV can continue to make money by living on the project without pulling disks. Can this be explained?? ， In general, the mechanism DEV needs to be designed well and recognized by the public in order to achieve a win-win situation. I would like to remind everyone to carefully read the project mechanism content before getting on board to avoid falling into traps. Why do I feel like this? This is not a technical issue, it is a human design mechanism issue. You can easily see on Flap that some people are willing to spend time telling stories, creating content, and building communities, because they are not gambling on the last game, but on whether they can make this project last longer. The current market environment is very clear. Most people are a bit tired of short-term PVP projects and gradually switch to long-term projects. What the market lacks is people who are willing to stay for the long term and work together to build, rather than those who have been eliminated by the market at a loss. In today's environment, there are already enough tools that can be launched at once, but if DEV really wants to do community, IP, and running projects, Flap is obviously more in line with the current path. I personally have a positive outlook on the future development of the Butterfly platform, and I believe that more and more people share the same view as me. In fact, they are doing better and better. The Butterfly platform has many mechanisms that can be integrated, and I sincerely recommend that those who do not want to continue P join the Butterfly community. On behalf of myself and all classmates and friends in the God of Wealth community: Wishing Butterfly Platform smooth sailing and thriving performance Finally, I wish all projects launched by the Butterfly Platform can achieve the dreams of every holder, and everything will be better in 2026 ❤️❤️ @webhogwatrs @eth_cedric After finishing this article, I'm going to faint again Flap God of Wealth On the fifth day of the lunar new year, welcome the God of Wealth