Massimo's timeline is a case-study in how it doesn't matter how many followers you have: attacking something you do not fully understand and then trying to create an echo-chamber where dissenting voices cannot be heard, does not work tend to out well for the attacker. Especially when that thing you don't understand is Bitcoin mining. Last night: posts Bitcoin mining FUD. Ratioed 2:1. Deletes post 8am: Reposts deleted Bitcoin mining FUD. Ratioed: 4:1. Deletes post 12pm: Blocks all those (including me) who commented with divergent views to OP. Re-reposts deleted Bitcoin mining FUD. Community Noted! Deletes post. 12.57pm: Blocks new commenters also. Re-re-reposts deleted Bitcoin mining FUD All I can say is "wow" Here's how my AI interpreted this behavior: "In essence, this behavior is a public performance of a bruised ego. It shows an unwillingness to engage with criticism, a desire to control the narrative by sanitizing the audience, and a persistent need to have the "last word" or a "successful" post, even if artificially manufactured. The tactic is generally viewed negatively within internet culture as a sign of dishonesty and fragility, as it actively prevents open discussion and creates an artificial bubble of agreement." Do you think either my documentation of the timeline or AI's interpretation of your actions is unfair @Rainmaker1973 ?(Daniel Batten)