The big proposal of Uniswap cost switch is aimed at "must pass", not to mention the proposal of retrospectively destroying 100 million UNI pure welfare pendants. But I didn't expect the support rate to reach 99%+ There are 110 million votes in favor and only 700 votes against, a difference of five or six orders of magnitude . If I had known such overwhelming words, everyone would have carefully analyzed the pros and cons of the cost switch before, feeling that it was purely a waste of emotions 。 ---Dividing line--- However, for u1s1, after the cost is opened, it will be another hardship for LP, which will be subject to a tax of about 1/4-1/6 to be used for destroying UNI. In fact, traditional exchanges like CEX usually encourage makers to collect money from Takers, and some high VIP makers can even receive negative fees. LPs like DEX, facing huge and unpredictable losses, work as makers 24 hours a day, working tirelessly and being pure and kind-hearted makers. Especially for Uni's LP, which has not received much UNI emissions (compared to other DEX), this time it has suffered another setback. Happy for UNI holders, but also heartbroken for LPs for 5 seconds 。