I really can't stand it. Each project has to submit a certain amount of tokens to each exchange, and then everyone blames the exchange and pours them. Looking back, isn't this inevitable? Is it reasonable for you to blame this project for plummeting after it goes live?? Isn't this the act of handing over to the exchange in the early stage? Give platform coin benefits to their holders and have them send tokens to them? Which project party is willing to do this? Then why don't I just hold the platform token? After all, any project you enter is a drop, and I'm just selling the token after receiving it. This is already your behavior on Binance, blaming others for selling after going online? Are you also blaming others for not buying after going online? It's really inexplicable. We all understand your original intention of providing benefits to everyone. Holding BNB can earn you rewards and even give back, but these people can only smash the market with the tokens they raised in the first place. Then others are like bastards. This is not dictatorship. What is dictatorship?? I'm not the Crown Prince who would be a licking dog. If I had to reveal anything, I would have a lot to say. The Crown Prince doesn't cut leeks for a day or two. I just asked, can there still be a knockoff season When market maker 1011 was knocked down by Binance, there were no industry leaders left? There is a pile of evidence in hand, should we just reveal it? Benson, save me