This son, that son, can only be recognized by CZ if he can run out on his own, and even end up paying the bill, right? If @ Aster_deX hadn't had that wave of violent buying that caught the attention of the entire network, the team would have demonstrated good abilities. They might have been given three feet of white silk long ago, and there wouldn't have been any follow-up recognition of relatives. I think this internal cultivation method is quite good. As far as I know, the early project Labs has invested a certain share at a relatively low valuation and will maintain the qualification for leading follow-up investment in the future. That is to say, if the project team itself is awesome to dry up, the subsequent monetary security side will be willing to invest more funds and support in a larger valuation. If you can't do it, then treat it as if you don't have this son, so don't blindly believe in the "son theory" and just keep talking. If someone really invests a large amount of money just because they are close to Binance, regardless of whether they are born with disabilities or intellectual disabilities, and insists on promoting them to higher positions, that would be foolish and irrational. Having a Labs endorsement provides at least a little more assurance of project legitimacy and exposure, and the team also faces survival pressure and must work hard. In the current situation where VCs are almost dead, it's really good from the perspective of entrepreneurs. But we still have to choose ourselves, otherwise why invest in research?