Stable's main network has been online for a few days now, but the transaction fees and TVL data cannot be easily stretched. Comparing the overall performance of Stable and Plasma reminds people of Aptos and SUI, which have similar technical routes and team backgrounds, but with significant differences in results. Apart from some minor technical differences, the SUI team is clearly better at playing Crypto Native, as evidenced by several fold differences in DeFi TVL, which also gives ecological projects a higher ceiling. Last month, @ MMTFinance, which was newly launched through Buidlpad and airdropped on Binance HODLer, is one of the top projects in the SUI ecosystem. Compared to Cetus, Momentum seems to have greater ambitions, adopting a hybrid model of CLMM (Concentrated Liquidity)+ve (3,3), combining the high efficiency of Uniswap V3 with Curve's bribery game. In terms of economic models, the core of MMT lies in its veTokenomics design: 1) Only by becoming a veMMT through lock up can one receive commission dividends, governance rights, and bribery benefits (Bribes); 2) At the same time, MMT has turned LP into a shareholder through lock-in, enhancing stickiness. In a bull market, when the Sui ecosystem erupts → project parties need to compete for liquidity → they have to buy MMT and bribe veMMT holders → MMT demand increases → coin prices rise → yield increases, this forms a positive flywheel, giving MMT the opportunity to become a "golden shovel". If you are optimistic about the Sui ecosystem, MMT is a good Beta asset. Trading MMT on Binance (BNB long-term holder steadily making profits): https://(binance. com)/zh-CN/coin? ref=538343781