The previous bear chain was too complex. To be honest, the POL mechanism was actually inspired by OHM and can be considered the most important branch of disk learning (proof of liquidity). Essentially, it turns user liquidity into protocol liquidity From the perspective of disk studies, Berachain: The entire chain is like a PoL super disk, and everyone is focusing on this liquidity accumulation to increase or decrease their holdings of returns. @ InfraedFinance is the hand that makes this disk "smooth" It did a few things: With PoL Vaults, you can easily access PoL without having to tinker with rules yourself Revitalize BGT and BERA with iBGT/iBERA: both profit and governance, and continue to promote DeFi Using iVaults to package PoL+LP/Pendle/compound interest strategies, similar to YFI in the past The same chip can be repeatedly rotated in multiple positions: PoL returns, DeFi returns, governance rights, you can all take a lap here, and the advantage here is the compound interest around liquidity Of course, this is not without risk. The risk is whether you think Bera will continue to decline. Given that the Bera team's large unlocking will take place next year, I estimate that if there is a drop, it may really be at the bottom. In order for POL to turn around, it must be driven by price, otherwise this plate will not be able to spin ok， Returning to Infrared, he is currently the default entry point for Berachain: PoL vault coverage of over 80%, control of 35%+BGT emissions, approximately 1/3 BERA staking, TVL peak exceeding $2 billion; Obtained Framework lead investment, integrated iBERA with BitGo, and is still discussing cooperation with institutions such as PayPal You can abstract the disk of Infrared as infrastructure, similar to the front-end operation of Hyperliquid in addition to basedapp. If Bera wants to get up, you should closely monitor the data of Infrared