Damn it, what if you admit that the airdrop was given to yourself or not? To put it bluntly, a Monad no cost testing network could not and should not have been airdropped, as Monad himself did not provide it The only thing that surprised me was that they actually offered air drops to Monad users. Since the launch of APR, I have assumed that @ aPriori has left the Monad ecosystem or fallen out, which is why I rushed to Monad and tried my best to cash out a few days before its launch So what's the situation now? Why suddenly send it to Monad users again? I think it's nothing more than: 1. Key resources have been secured, but Monad narrative must be leveraged 2. Monad has promised to provide certain key resources or funds 3. Use the hedging funds obtained from this to pile up OI Now Monad has money, but their pre-market sentiment is already very poor. They are launching on Coinbase to save on the cost of listing on Binance, but the price is that it is difficult to engage in high-level control. If it is a case of 2, then the APR performance that has been washed up in the early stage may be blocked by some "tasks" And if it's the case of 3, it also makes sense. He only managed to push the Binance contract OI above 11.3M on the opening day, and then continued to decline. If you don't actively search for it yourself, it's unlikely for the current market to rely on natural quantities to build OI. Then we can only find 'liquidatable assets' ourselves Based on the feedback from previous public domain traffic regarding poor communication within the team, it can even be assumed that the team is aware that "Fud" is not necessarily a bad thing Anyway, there will be many more strategies for the pre game against Monad as a result. At level two, it is absolutely impossible to use whether level one is CS as a criterion for evaluation