Hi @okx team, You claim to be an exchange for all cryptocurrencies. Yet this year you have consistently put out negative (and factually incorrect) information about one: Bitcoin Your article yesterday on Bitcoin mining environmental impact is the third negative article about Bitcoin you've written this year (receipts attached) You've included claims about eWaste and water usage that were debunked in 2023 (Sai & Vranken). Tellingly, other mainstream news outlets have now ceased making these claims. Further, your inference that Bitcoin mining "relies heavily on fossil fuels" is directly contradicted by Cambridge's latest report shows Bitcoin is 52.4% sustainably powered (more than any other global industry). This is not the first time I've written to you about these inaccuracies, yet you have continued to publish more of them even after your peers in the industry have stopped. Care to comment? CC: @wallet, @OKX_Ventures(Daniel Batten)