Quick update: Just now, @gaib_ai's CEO @konyk001 gave a swift response to the FUD surrounding CBB. The team's reaction was really timely. As for the explanation about proof of reserves, I find it pretty convincing. Around ten days ago, when I was doing some internal DD with friends, we looked into the specific reserve issues here. The deposits are basically distributed across various chains. I haven’t had the chance to check the current situation yet, but I’ll take some time to confirm again. With the market like this, seeing FUD around deposit projects is honestly nerve-wracking. CBB mentioned that the issue is more about third-party ratings, but when it comes to rating agencies... personally, I feel it’s no different from audits. If we’re talking about third parties, nothing’s more transparent than checking on-chain reserves directly on etherscan or arbiscan. As for the relationship between USDAI (another GPU-related stablecoin project) and CBB, I won’t comment much . After all, the ones who know the project best are probably its competitors. That said, the issues raised are indeed things users care about.