@arkham I’ve been tracking the SpaceX transactions for the past two weeks. Why? Because historically, SpaceX selling has had a major impact on Bitcoin price. Four months ago, after 2 years and 8 months of no activity, a large movement was observed which turned out to be an internal consolidation into Coinbase Custody. So at first, I considered the possibility that this latest movement was the same. But this pattern is different. This time, the coins were moved again, from a newly created Coinbase Prime Custody wallet. And when that happens, the possibility of an OTC transaction opens up. Also, based on Arkham’s usual labeling pattern, these addresses are normally labeled within 1–2 days, as shown in the red box. But it has now been three weeks, and this address still hasn't been labeled. That’s why this case is particularly interesting. Whenever SpaceX has sold in the past, a major drop in price has always followed. So I’ll ask directly: @arkham what do you think? With your normal labeling system, this wallet should have been tagged within 1–2 days. But this time, it hasn’t. It looks like a different pattern entirely. Would appreciate your insight here. I'm very curious about the current SpaceX wallet transactions. Followers, please tag Arkham in the comments! 현재 SpaceX 의 트랜잭션이 너무 궁금합니다. 팔로워분들은 아캄을 태그해주시면 감사드리겠습니다.(mignolet)