When @ okxchinese decided to restart Xlayer and follow the old path of BSC, they probably thought that such a day would come sooner or later. On chain projects such as Rug or self theft are bound to occur. As a decentralized chain, the quality of projects on top varies greatly. Who has the ability to ensure that all devs who look like humans are responsible for human resources? If something happens, should CEX intervene and how deep should they intervene? These issues were also difficult to grasp in terms of scale when BSC first emerged. Anyway, the victims will feel like they are playing with your chain for your CEX brand, and if something happens, they will say they are not from the same family. Manage it, it makes people feel that it is not decentralized enough, and regulatory compliance may also be problematic. More importantly, if all the projects on the chain have to do DD, how many people would need to be recruited to manage them? So it seems that OKX has chosen to use a relatively less official account to pursue this Rug project, expressing their attitude without being too deeply involved with the OKX entity. ~~~~~~~~~~~~ Taking history as a lesson, the first generation BSC team was criticized for this incident. How was it resolved? Due to the sudden wealth effect of star projects such as Cake XVS, as well as the launch of a large number of high-quality projects through Pancake, users know which coins are feasible to buy and gradually develop the ability to find high-quality project channels. Secondly, there are also some reliable KOLs who have been deeply involved in the chain, and they have worked together to share the DD pressure of on chain projects and lead users to avoid junk projects. Some words are difficult for the official to say, but KOLs say there is no problem, mutual achievement. Thirdly, starting from MVB in the later stages, multiple rounds of screening and data monitoring allowed junk projects that wanted to make quick money to be screened out, incubating a large number of relatively reliable projects. Even so, there will still be problems such as project supervision and self theft, especially in the late stage of the market. @The biggest problem with XLayer Official at present is that since its high-profile announcement, there has not been a significant wave of wealth creation effect with high certainty, and its core infrastructure has not been developed. The current market downturn poses a greater challenge to dev's market structure. If we fast forward to the fundraising stage, users will feel very uncomfortable. Of course, this is also related to the urgent shortage of core team members. My personal suggestion is that @ star_okx may need to be unconventional in reducing talent, quickly identify the core team to boost morale, and then quickly incubate/invest in several core infrastructure projects of Xlayer internally, so that users who are still willing to believe in OKX can receive tangible rewards, see the sweetness, and retain people's hearts. Since the emphasis is on building, it is important to see what is being built on Xlayer as soon as possible, so that those who support building can make money and more people can believe in it, forming a virtuous cycle. If the market really enters a bear market phase after this wave, it will be even more difficult to do. There is not much time left at the moment, so keep up the good work. @Haiteng_okx @mia_okx @okxchinese @Cryptosis9_OKX