Incredibly @Grokipedia is already better than Wikipedia for Ethereum. It's not as pretty, and it's definitely not polished (not even rendering the EF's logo on the second line) but it's far more substantive and factual. Wikipedia is plagued by centralization of editors who have been slowly corrupted by their power over the years. Historically, anti-crypto troll David Gerard wielded dictator-like authority over the Ethereum entry. He did just enough to keep it "neutral" while shading it to his agenda, but also keeping it relatively substance-free. Substantively, Grokipedia just does much better than Wikipedia as a result. For example, Wikipedia only mentions Solidity once in the body. Grokipedia mentions it 11 times. Alternatively, checkout how Grokipedia includes a decent writeup on rollups. Wikipedia's entry is so pathetic that it doesn't even mention rollups. Not even once. Bullish Grokipedia(Evan Van Ness 🧉)