The team Anoma is easily confused in terms of brand. ANOMA should be the intended flagship project. @ANOMA should have been the first to establish the intentional blockchain track, which became popular for a period of time in 2023 and 2024. And this team has basically built a large amount of infrastructure for intentions, including new programming languages, vm， And privacy, customization of the chain (in order to meet the different rules in different regions, such as China's laws and regulations and Germany's). And privacy is an important feature of his intention. But this team first separated privacy and created a privacy blockchain for NAM, which serves as the infrastructure for privacy pools for external chains (including the entire Cosmos ecosystem). So he and NAM should be two independent projects, with one team. So his most core chain is still his intended project, @ anoma. Raised over 60 million US dollars in financing. This project is still worth looking forward to, as the entire infrastructure construction has taken a lot of time and has a relatively large threshold. @ANOMA's vision is to become a global coordinated infrastructure, whether it's coordinating transactions, liquidity, and more. But why is it a global coordinated infrastructure. @Previously, two excellent papers were published by ANOMA introducing the vision and architecture of the project: 1）Anoma: Undefining Money Versatile commitments to value 2）Anoma: a unified architecture for full-stack decentralised applications Very worth reading, you can see what problems they have seen and abstracted, as well as what new calculations and coordination methods they have proposed. There is relatively little research material on the concept of "in". The following URL can be considered as a collection of articles and scenarios with various intentions: https://anoma.net/research In addition, his CEO Adrian Brink @ AdrianBrink announced a collaboration with Kaito https://(x.com)/adrianbrink/status/1937880099996483687