The voting mechanism of Kaito Connect currently has significant areas for optimization and improvement. Voting for projects now yields almost no returns, and there is a lack of positive feedback from users after casting their votes. Over time, this enthusiasm for participation can easily be depleted Looking back, Kaito Connect used to be a topical event involving competition between project parties and active participation of individual investors. In addition, the main function of yaps and NFTs is to empower voting and mobilize the enthusiasm of the C-end community, so that project parties can feel the effect of the @ KaitoAI panel. However, although I ranked among the top 10 yappers in @ AIWayfinder's voting this time, I didn't receive any coins, which I think actually exposes some problems As a yapper who holds NFTs, I would like to make some suggestions to make @ Punk9277 pay attention to the importance of Kaito Connect feature 👉 The core problem is nothing more than that: Kaito Connect is essentially an opportunity to eliminate foam and empower Kaito's core assets. However, the speed of project launch is too fast, and only the speed and cycle of regulating voting and winning elections can force the project party to provide empowerment for Kaito's core assets -The impact of the project going online too quickly: --In the past, when the number of projects was small, users had a stronger sense of participation, and the project team was willing to provide incentives for the voting process, even bringing users closer through community interaction. At that time, there were not many choices on the panel, and everyone's attention was more focused --But now that the pace of project launch has accelerated, users may feel that their sense of participation has weakened, and the mutual assistance relationship between the project team and users is no longer so obvious -From the perspective of KaitoAI's business model: --ToB business is definitely the core, and the more projects go online, the more advantageous it will be for Kaito's revenue --However, if the high-speed launch continues, the unique value of Kaito Connect and Kaito panels may gradually weaken, with diminishing marginal effects. -If the project's launch speed slows down slightly and the quantity is appropriately reduced, there may be these benefits: --For the project team: The exposure and marketing effect of a single project will be better, the attention will be more focused, and the project team will also have more motivation to optimize their community interaction --For users: the yaps and NFTs in their hands will appear more valuable, and the motivation and reward for participating in voting can also be enhanced Speaking of which... it seems like I haven't voted in weeks Overall, adjusting the pace appropriately may make Kaito Connect's ecosystem more balanced, benefiting both project parties and users. If we want to equate Kaito's launchpad with an information exchange, then there should also be a listing, delisting, and appropriate model that is conducive to empowering core assets