Charts
DataOn-chain
VIP
Market Cap
API
Rankings
CoinOSNew
CoinClaw🦞
Language
  • 简体中文
  • 繁体中文
  • English
Leader in global market data applications, committed to providing valuable information more efficiently.

Features

  • Real-time Data
  • Special Features
  • AI Grid

Services

  • News
  • Open Data(API)
  • Institutional Services

Downloads

  • Desktop
  • Android
  • iOS

Contact Us

  • Chat Room
  • Business Email
  • Official Email
  • Official Verification

Join Community

  • Telegram
  • Twitter
  • Discord

© Copyright 2013-2026. All rights reserved.

简体繁體English
|Legacy
BTCBTC
💲76700.44
-
0.82%
ETHETH
💲2111.18
-
1.39%
SOLSOL
💲84.49
-
0.79%
HYPEHYPE
💲47.62
+
4.72%
USDCUSDC
💲1.00
-
0%
ZECZEC
💲541.62
+
5.13%

Scott Johnsson
Scott Johnsson|3月 26, 2025 19:22
Some initial thoughts, on a quick read (I may come back to make corrections): Follows GENIUS Act in prohibiting yield. Eliminates some of the strange drafting issues from the GENIUS Act, so now payment stablecoins are defined separately and then are explicitly prohibited from providing yield to *holders*. Given limited to paying yield to holders, doesn't seem like Circle/CB-like partnerships are included in the prohibition. If we're going down this route, best approach would be for permission to pay yield contingent on approval by federal regulators. We should at least leave the *possibility* of this door being opened. No reason for complete legislative ban other than to protect banking institutions' deposit-taking business.
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

HotFlash

|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

APP
Windows
Mac

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Hot Reads