Breaking free from the rigid shackles of closed formalism and returning to the realistic intuition of being alive. -The shackles of Pythagoras that everything is a natural number were broken by the physical phenomenon of the diagonal of a square with a side length of 1, and finally real numbers appeared. -Euclidean plane geometry was shackled by the parallel lines of the fifth kilometer plane geometry, and was broken by the physical phenomenon that the Earth is circular, eventually giving rise to surface geometry. -At present, Newton's deterministic mechanical theory has also reached the point where it cannot solve the shackles of real living systems. The law of universal gravitation in Newton's deterministic mechanical theory can only describe the approximate motion trajectory between two celestial bodies (relative motion/rest), while Poincar é verified that Newton's calculus is unsolvable when describing the motion of three bodies. Describing the motion laws of three or more celestial bodies is an unpredictable intuitive system. Poincar é called it a chaotic system. Human scientists are emerging various new methodologies to solve new problems. -Turing's Turing machine was a computer created by imitating the philosophy of machines thinking like the human brain. Turing is a typical Newton in the field of computer science, who also did not consider solving the real and meaningful physical phenomena of life, including emotions/feelings. G ö del criticized Turing with his incompleteness theorem at the time, but Turing's answer was very interesting: "Nowadays, computers are just starting out, and we have a lot of computing to do. There is no need to consider the meaning of G ö del's real feelings of being alive for the time being." However, as computers have developed to the point where computing has reached a bottleneck and computers cannot solve real problems in reality, we need to seriously break free from Newton's deterministic mechanistic theory and return to Darwin's evolutionary model of the emergence of human and natural individuals to re-establish abstract philosophy. -Similarly, Weiner's meaningful communication between man and nature is the Internet built by breaking through Shannon's meaningless communication information theory. -Similarly, our cryptocurrency industry has been constrained by formal blockchain technology for too long, and we cannot achieve the same consensus as Bitcoin through forms such as consortium chains, oracle machines, and RWAs. The reason is that deterministic consensus is a rigid and closed mechanical tool based on Newton's deterministic reductionism, which can never generate a sense of living order, while Bitcoin is an intuitive system based on Darwin's theory of evolution, where individuals emerge and live to solve real-world problems. Based on the above analogy logic, we should recognize the limitations of the current deterministic formal blockchain technology, which can only be used as a rigid and closed tool system. I should step out of the realm of deterministic formal blockchain technology and use Darwin's theory of individual competition and evolution between humans and nature as a guide, and Satoshi Nakamoto has given us a living and real example of Bitcoin. We can summarize it into two techniques: a feedback control loop system and a design technique for individual emergence order. And a philosophy: the competition of individual reflexivity, also known as the proactive self-examination of individuals, which leads to the emergence of an unpredictable global intuition system, is used to create a real existentialist reality intuition system.