Original Title: "Keynote Address at the Crypto Task Force Roundtable on Tokenization"

Source: SEC

Translation by: Meta Era

Date: May 12, 2025

Location: Washington, D.C.

Thank you all, good afternoon. I am pleased to address the guests at today’s roundtable on "Tokenization." I also want to thank all the panel members participating in the discussion.

The topic we are discussing today is very timely, as securities are increasingly migrating from traditional (i.e., "off-chain") databases to blockchain (i.e., "on-chain") ledger systems.

The migration of securities from off-chain to on-chain systems is akin to the transition of audio from analog vinyl records to tapes, and then to digital software decades ago. The ability to digitally encode audio allows for easy transmission, modification, and storage, unleashing tremendous innovative potential in the music industry. Audio is no longer confined to static, fixed formats but can interoperate across devices and applications. It can be combined, split, and programmed, leading to entirely new product forms. This has also spawned various new hardware devices and streaming business models, greatly benefiting consumers and the U.S. economy.

Just as digital audio disrupted the music industry, on-chain securities have the potential to reshape every aspect of the securities market, including the issuance, trading, holding, and use of securities. For example, on-chain securities can enable the automatic distribution of dividends through smart contracts. Tokenization can also enhance capital formation, transforming previously illiquid assets into tradable investment opportunities. Blockchain technology is expected to expand the various new uses of securities, giving rise to many market activities that current commission rules have not envisioned.

To realize President Trump’s vision of "making America the global crypto capital," this commission must keep pace with innovation and reassess whether existing regulations need to be updated to accommodate on-chain securities and other crypto assets. Applying rules designed for off-chain securities directly to on-chain assets may create incompatible or unnecessary regulatory burdens, stifling the development of blockchain technology.

One of my core tasks as chair will be to establish a reasonable and clear regulatory framework for crypto assets, setting forth clear rules for the issuance, custody, and trading of crypto assets while cracking down on wrongdoers and protecting investors from fraud.

The SEC's policies will no longer be determined by "improvised enforcement." We will return to the intent set by Congress, establishing clear standards applicable to market participants through formal rulemaking, interpretations, and exemptions. Enforcement should return to the execution of existing rules, particularly in preventing fraud and manipulation.

This work requires close collaboration among the various offices and divisions of the SEC. Therefore, I am very pleased that Commissioners Uyeda and Peirce have jointly established the "Crypto Asset Working Group." The SEC has long been plagued by policy silos. This working group reflects our determination to break down barriers and quickly formulate clear policies.

Next, I will share three key areas of focus for crypto asset policy: issuance, custody, and trading.

1. Issuance

First, I hope the SEC can establish clear and reasonable guidelines for the issuance of crypto assets that involve securities or investment contracts. To date, only four crypto asset companies have issued crypto assets through registration and Regulation A. Most issuers choose to avoid registered offerings, partly because the related disclosure requirements are difficult to meet. If the issuance is not traditional securities (such as stocks, bonds, or notes), it is even harder for issuers to determine whether the crypto asset constitutes a "security" or investment contract.

In recent years, the SEC has adopted what I call an "ostrich policy"—seemingly hoping the crypto industry would simply disappear. It then shifted to a "shoot first, ask questions later" enforcement-style regulation. While verbally welcoming project teams to "come in and talk," no necessary adjustments have been made to the registration forms. For example, the S-1 form still requires disclosure of executive compensation and use of funds, which are often irrelevant or impossible to assess in crypto projects. The SEC has adjusted forms for special cases like asset-backed securities and real estate investment trusts, but has yet to make adjustments for crypto offerings despite the growing interest in crypto asset investments in recent years. We cannot try to "force a square peg into a round hole" to pave new paths.

Currently, SEC staff has issued a statement regarding the disclosure obligations for crypto asset issuances. Staff has also begun to clarify that certain crypto assets and distribution activities are not subject to securities laws. However, I believe this "staff statement" is merely a very temporary measure—the SEC must advance reform through formal commission action. I have instructed staff to explore whether additional exemption mechanisms, safe harbor provisions, and feasible pathways for crypto asset issuers are needed. I believe the SEC has broad discretion under securities laws to support the crypto industry, and I will push for this work to yield results.

2. Custody

Second, I support giving registered entities more options in the custody of crypto assets. SEC staff recently rescinded SAB 121, which cleared significant obstacles for businesses providing crypto asset custody services. This bulletin was itself a serious mistake—not only was it not approved by the commission, but it also overstepped its authority and caused unnecessary confusion in the market.

The SEC needs to do more than just rescind SAB 121. We should further clarify which entities can be considered "qualified custodians" under the Investment Advisers Act and the Investment Company Act, and provide reasonable exemptions for some common crypto custody methods. Many funds or advisory firms actually have more advanced self-custody solutions, whose security may even exceed that of some third-party custodians. Therefore, it is necessary for the SEC to allow compliant self-custody under certain conditions.

Additionally, we may need to completely abolish and reconstruct the existing "Special Purpose Broker-Dealer" framework. Currently, only two entities have obtained this status, clearly due to overly strict restrictions. In fact, broker-dealers have never been prohibited from custodying crypto assets, regardless of whether they constitute securities. The SEC may need to further clarify how the "customer protection rule" and "net capital rule" apply to crypto custody.

3. Trading

Third, I support allowing registered entities to offer a wider range of trading products based on market demand, breaking past SEC restrictions on crypto trading. For example, some broker-dealers wish to launch integrated "super apps" that combine securities, non-securities, and financial services. Federal securities laws do not prohibit registered broker-dealers from matching non-securities trades on their ATS platforms, including "hedging transactions" between securities and non-securities. I have asked staff to explore how to modernize the ATS rule framework to better serve crypto asset trading. We are also exploring ways through rules or guidance to allow national securities exchanges to more smoothly list crypto assets.

While the SEC and its staff are working hard to develop a comprehensive regulatory framework for crypto assets, securities market participants should not be forced to offshore innovative blockchain technology. I also want to explore conditional exemption mechanisms that allow new products and services that are difficult to implement due to current rule restrictions to have the opportunity to innovate under compliance.

I am willing to work with the Trump administration and colleagues in Congress to make the United States the best place for the global crypto asset market.

Thank you all for listening, and I look forward to the exciting discussions ahead.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。