Author: Three Sigma

Compiled by: Felix, PANews

In the rapidly evolving blockchain space, real-time trading is becoming a necessity rather than a luxury. With decentralized finance applications, payments, gaming, and high-frequency trading pushing the limits of traditional blockchain capabilities, the demand for real-time performance has never been stronger. In the competition to redefine trading speed and scalability, there are MegaETH, Monad, and Hyperliquid.

As mentioned in previous articles, MegaETH is an emerging L2 solution designed to prioritize real-time performance, promising near-instant block times and high transaction throughput, which has garnered market attention.

However, Hyperliquid and Monad intensify the competition with their unique approaches to optimizing blockchain performance. This article will delve into the advantages, architectures, and trade-offs of these solutions to clarify who might lead in the race for instant blockchain trading.

MegaETH

MegaETH is an L2 scaling solution specifically designed for Ethereum. What sets MegaETH apart is its focus on real-time blockchain performance, providing ultra-low latency and scalability for applications that require instant responsiveness.

Key Points

• Latency and Speed: MegaETH block times range from 1 to 10 milliseconds, processing 100,000 transactions per second (TPS).
• Dedicated Nodes: MegaETH employs a sorter-centric model, assigning dedicated roles to nodes (sorters, validators, and full nodes), simplifying execution and reducing redundancy.
• Integration with EigenDA: MegaETH leverages EigenDA for data availability, allowing it to scale without compromising reliability or performance.

Advantages

The architecture of MegaETH is designed for speed and efficiency, making it stand out in the competitive L2 space:

• Low Latency: Its near-instant transaction processing is ideal for high-frequency trading, gaming, and payment systems.
• Scalability: By processing blocks in a few milliseconds, MegaETH avoids the congestion issues that often plague other L2s during peak demand.
• EVM Compatibility: Fully compatible with the Ethereum ecosystem, enabling seamless integration with existing dApps while maintaining security.

Hyperliquid

While MegaETH focuses on real-time performance, it faces fierce competition from Hyperliquid and Monad, which take different approaches to optimize blockchain trading.

Hyperliquid is a fully on-chain perpetual trading protocol built on its own L1 blockchain, optimized for low latency and high throughput. By integrating spot, derivatives, and pre-release markets into its platform, Hyperliquid introduces a high-performance consensus mechanism, HyperBFT, and the HyperEVM program, aiming to scale its ecosystem through efficient liquidity aggregation.

• Vision: Hyperliquid aims to redefine the trading experience by providing high-speed, decentralized market infrastructure, making it highly attractive to financial institutions and large traders.
• Market Specialization: Its unique combination of spot and perpetual markets enables seamless liquidity aggregation and rapid settlement.

Hyperliquid's stack includes a broader range of financial primitives such as lending, governance, and native stablecoins. Built on its HyperBFT consensus, it achieves a block time of 0.2 seconds while maintaining a unified state across all components, ensuring performance, liquidity, and programmability. With over 262,000 users and processing 200,000 transactions per second, Hyperliquid positions itself as a leader in decentralized market infrastructure.

To further expand its influence, Hyperliquid offers Builder Codes, allowing other dApps and CEXs to seamlessly integrate its liquidity by paying fees per transaction. Builder Codes not only extend Hyperliquid's reach but also incentivize external platforms to leverage its high-performance trading infrastructure, enhancing liquidity and expanding its network effects.

Monad

Monad reimagines the EVM architecture, achieving high throughput through parallel execution. By addressing the limitations of Ethereum's sequential transaction processing, Monad unlocks new levels of efficiency and scalability.

• Vision: Monad aims to deliver cutting-edge blockchain performance while retaining decentralization, setting new standards for L1 scalability.
• Parallel Execution: Monad's architecture supports concurrent processing of transactions across multiple EVM instances, ensuring seamless integration with existing user and developer workflows.
• Full Compatibility: Monad ensures bytecode EVM compatibility and Ethereum RPC compatibility, integrating state-of-the-art internal optimizations without altering the developer experience.

Monad introduces pipelining to optimize transaction execution, consensus processes, and state synchronization, maximizing hardware efficiency and minimizing latency. Utilizing a custom MonadBFT consensus mechanism derived from HotStuff, the protocol supports a robust and decentralized validator set while achieving rapid block finality.

Key innovations include MonadDB (a dedicated database customized for Ethereum state access) and Optimistic parallel execution (ensuring high throughput with minimal overhead). Monad separates the consensus layer from the execution layer, further enhancing scalability, allowing developers to build applications that require both exceptional performance and low latency.

Monad's groundbreaking advancements make it a powerful platform for enterprise-grade applications, providing developers with the tools to create high-throughput dApps while maintaining Ethereum compatibility and embracing the future of blockchain innovation.

Comparison

By evaluating the key metrics of MegaETH, Hyperliquid, and Monad, a comprehensive understanding of their unique advantages and trade-offs can be gained. This comparison focuses on latency, throughput (TPS), EVM compatibility, use cases, time to finality (TTF), and decentralization trade-offs. These attributes highlight the fundamental requirements for scaling blockchain infrastructure while ensuring practical utility and performance.

Latency:

• MegaETH excels in ultra-low latency (1-10 milliseconds) for L2 transactions, suitable for applications requiring near-instant responsiveness, such as high-frequency trading or competitive gaming.
• Hyperliquid's sub-second latency is optimized for financial markets, enabling rapid order execution and a seamless trading experience.
• Monad's parallel low-latency execution ensures stability even under heavy network loads, supporting a variety of dApps.

Throughput (TPS):

• MegaETH boasts a throughput of over 100,000 TPS, emphasizing scalability for large-scale applications.
• Hyperliquid achieves 200,000 TPS through its proprietary HyperBFT consensus and L1 optimizations.
• Monad's maximum TPS is 10,000, focusing on balancing high performance with decentralization.

EVM Compatibility:

• MegaETH's full EVM compatibility ensures seamless access for developers and existing dApps.
• Hyperliquid integrates HyperEVM, a customized version for financial market use cases.
• Monad's redesigned EVM supports high-performance execution while maintaining compatibility with Ethereum tools and standards.

Use Cases:

• MegaETH targets gaming, trading, and payment systems, emphasizing real-time interaction and high scalability.
• Hyperliquid focuses on financial markets, providing infrastructure for derivatives, spot trading, and market-making.
• Monad's versatility supports a range of dApps, particularly those requiring high throughput and low latency.

Time to Finality (TTF):

• MegaETH L2 transactions achieve near-instant finality (10 milliseconds), but full settlement on Ethereum L1 takes about 7 days.
• Hyperliquid's 1-2 seconds TTF strikes a balance between low latency and consensus mechanisms.
• Monad completes transactions within 1 second, providing a practical combination of speed and security.

Decentralization Trade-offs:

• MegaETH's centralized sorter design sacrifices some decentralization for L2 real-time performance.
• Hyperliquid's market-centric architecture prioritizes low latency and high throughput over decentralization.
• Monad's design seeks to maintain balance, optimizing performance and decentralization through parallel execution and delayed state updates.

Conclusion

MegaETH, Hyperliquid, and Monad each bring unique innovations to the blockchain ecosystem, catering to different needs:

• MegaETH: Excelling in latency and TPS, it is an ideal choice for real-time applications, but its centralized sorter design raises concerns about decentralization.
• Hyperliquid: Winning in financial markets with its HyperEVM and liquidity integration, but less versatile than MegaETH in other dApp categories.
• Monad: Balancing decentralization and performance, leveraging parallel execution to enhance TPS and support various applications.

Who leads among the three? It depends on the use case:

• In trading and liquidity, Hyperliquid emerges as a strong contender with its focus on the financial sector.
• For general dApp scalability, MegaETH leads with its real-time performance and broader application scope.
• For decentralized high-throughput applications, Monad's parallelized EVM offers a better choice for developers prioritizing decentralization.

Key Observations:

• Trade-offs of MegaETH: By sacrificing decentralization, MegaETH achieves unparalleled speed, making it highly attractive for real-time systems such as trading and gaming. While MegaETH relies on Ethereum L1 for settlement (ensuring trust and security), it inherits Ethereum's finality delay. In contrast, Monad and Hyperliquid achieve faster native finality through their independent consensus mechanisms, prioritizing instant performance but sacrificing Ethereum's shared security guarantees.
• Specialization of Hyperliquid: Hyperliquid stands out in the financial markets due to its speed, liquidity aggregation, and seamless trading infrastructure. However, its focus on trading limits the versatility of the broader dApp ecosystem, reducing its appeal for general applications. Additionally, its centralized HyperBFT consensus raises concerns about decentralization and trust, heavily relying on external liquidity to maintain its performance and ecosystem growth.
• Balance of Monad: Monad strikes a balance between scalability and decentralization through its parallel execution model, providing developers with high throughput without compromising EVM compatibility. However, its reliance on hardware (e.g., 32 GB RAM, high bandwidth) limits accessibility for smaller operators, potentially leading to network centralization. Its independent L1 consensus offers autonomy but sacrifices Ethereum's security guarantees, which may deter developers who prioritize trust and shared security.

The competition between MegaETH, Hyperliquid, and Monad highlights a key aspect of blockchain development: there is currently no single solution that can dominate all use cases. Each platform excels in its domain, offering unique value propositions that meet different needs. For developers and enterprises, decision-making often boils down to specific application requirements, whether it be speed, market liquidity, or decentralized scalability.

These projects also emphasize the importance of continuous innovation in blockchain infrastructure. As adoption rates grow, the industry must reconcile the scalability trilemma with user expectations for low fees, high performance, and strong security. Collaborative advancements, such as integrating solutions from different ecosystems, may drive the next wave of blockchain breakthroughs. As blockchain technology evolves, these platforms push the boundaries of what is possible, paving the way for faster, scalable, and efficient decentralized systems.

Ultimately, the choice of which to use depends on the priorities of developers and users: speed, decentralization, or specialization.

Related reading: The Competition of High-Performance Public Chains: A Comparison and Future Outlook of MegaETH and Monad

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。