Author: Zhou, ChainCatcher
In the past month (August 1 - 31), there has been a clear divergence within the cryptocurrency market. Bitcoin (BTC) peaked and then fell back, ending the month down 6.15%; Ethereum (ETH) continued its strong performance, rising 19.84%; Solana (SOL) and BNB increased by 17.85% and 9.79%, respectively. Overall, a structural market emerged, with sentiment becoming cautious by the end of the month.
In contrast, related stocks in the secondary market faced more concentrated pressure. MicroStrategy (MSTR), which is heavily invested in Bitcoin, fell 16.78% in August, significantly underperforming BTC itself; Ethereum treasury and related stocks generally experienced deep corrections.
Why can't on-chain impulses drive stock valuations? This is pushing the "coin-stock linkage" to a crossroads that needs recalibration.
August Overview: From Dislocation to Joint Decline, Stocks More Fragile
August was not a one-sided bull market. BTC peaked and then fell back, ultimately closing down; although ETH, SOL, and BNB still saw monthly gains, they all followed a "rise then retreat" pattern—overall, it resembled a scenario of rising and cooling down.
The stock market's reaction was more sensitive. Simply put, two factors are at play: first, valuation premiums are shrinking (the "price difference" between stock prices and net asset values is decreasing, even turning into discounts), and second, financing expectations are heating up (the market is concerned about continued issuance and convertible bonds). The same on-chain volatility, when transmitted to stock prices, gets amplified, leading to deeper pullbacks.
The attitude on the institutional side has also turned cold, further compressing the "imagination" of valuations. According to Barron’s, analysts Gus Galá from Monness, Crespi, Hardt downgraded MSTR from Neutral to Sell in April and maintained a Sell rating with a target price of $175 on August 21, citing Bitcoin's high volatility and cyclicality, the company's balance sheet fragility due to high-leverage coin purchases, and the potential retreat of a premium relative to a net asset value of about 1.34 times. For many institutions, rather than bearing the uncertainties of corporate governance and dilution, it is preferable to directly allocate to spot assets or hold through compliant funds, naturally leading to a loss of premium space for coin stocks in such comparisons.
Crossroads: Repair Linkage or Shut Down Early?
What determines the direction is not the price itself, but whether the transmission efficiency can be repaired. In the past month, the three links of treasury, financing, and operations have almost simultaneously generated friction.
First, let's look at treasury transmission. Taking SharpLink (SBET) as an example, it has continuously updated its Ethereum holdings over the past month, while also initiating at-the-market (ATM) offerings and signaling that "if the stock price is below net asset value, buybacks will be considered." By the end of August, it ranked as the second-largest Ethereum treasury company. However, its stock price did not strengthen in sync with ETH, and in August, it even closed down overall, with its total market value falling below its ETH holdings. The market cares more about "how to hold and how to govern" than "how much to hold," and simply increasing the balance has become difficult to translate into valuation premiums.
Second, financing transmission is backfiring on stock prices. The narrative that once linked market capitalization to coin prices through "issuing stocks to buy coins" is collapsing. For instance, ETH Z disclosed that it holds over $349 million in ETH reserves, but due to a large-scale stock issuance plan, market concerns about dilution triggered a sharp decline in its stock price. This validates the notion that "financing is not a means to push up stock prices, but has become a source of suppression."
Finally, there is operational transmission. Mining institutions are under pressure to profit, and exchanges are experiencing sluggish growth, which weakens the linkage between stock prices and coin prices. According to Coinbase's Q2 financial report, its trading revenue was only about $764 million, a nearly 40% quarter-over-quarter decline; overall revenue fell from $2.034 billion in the first quarter to $1.497 billion, a quarter-over-quarter decrease of 26.4%. This indicates that although BTC and ETH are rising, the operational performance of exchanges has not improved in tandem, making it difficult to attract stock price increases.
The cumulative result of all this: The late-cycle flavor has emerged. The short- to medium-term momentum of coin prices is starting to "pull back and pause," with sharpness dulling; the stock side is more fragile—premium retreat, financing fatigue, and operational elasticity not keeping up often lead to stocks "gasping" before coins, with early shutdown becoming a consensus.
Repair or Decouple: Watch Three Small Things
From this, it can be inferred that even if these companies continue to purchase BTC/ETH at this moment, the marginal returns are more likely to quickly approach "net asset value," rather than the past scenario of "adding a layer of premium above net asset value." This is also the core of the crossroads: whether to rely on mechanisms to repair the transmission or to accept a longer period of structural decoupling.
Judging the direction does not require betting on grand narratives; just focus on these three small things:
Watch mNAV discounts: Can they converge within 3-4 weeks, or even return to the premium range?
Watch financing actions: Will they shift from high-frequency ATM/convertible bonds to a more restrained pace, supplemented by buybacks/lock-ups to "anchor" net asset value per share?
Watch operational indicators: On-chain transaction fees/volumes rebounding, marginal declines in mining companies' cash costs, and increases in non-trading revenue proportions from exchange derivatives/custody, etc.
If two of the three are satisfied, the linkage story still has a sequel; otherwise, "decoupling" will be nailed down, and the elastic punishment that coin stocks endure during the pullback period will be heavier.
Conclusion
Overall, this wave of "synchronized cooling" in late August is not an isolated incident, but a public stress test. Moving forward, investors face the choice of continuing to bet on those companies that can translate "stories" into "mechanisms," or bypassing them to return to native assets and more transparent allocation tools. For the industry, this is more of a model reassessment: are coin stocks a bridge to mainstream capital, or the first to shut down in the next round of market trends? The crossroads is already in front of us, and time will not be infinitely forgiving.
Click to learn about job openings at ChainCatcher
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
